<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I Look For in a Potential Manager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techdarkside.com/what-i-look-for-in-a-potential-manager/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techdarkside.com/what-i-look-for-in-a-potential-manager</link>
	<description>Struggles of a Self-Taught Coder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.techdarkside.com/what-i-look-for-in-a-potential-manager/comment-page-1#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 04:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techdarkside.com/?p=46#comment-147</guid>
		<description>&gt; testing a manager’s abilities in these areas without letting them know they’re being tested

Not sure that I have a direct way.  But the thing I have been taught about creating such tests is from watching women ask questions.  Ask a question to which the correct answer is to not answer it at all.  For example a yes or no question that the correct answer is to discount the question in the first place.

But some clues at recognizing the ability to judge well:
- The ability to disconnect from the surface and see through to the underlying waves.  
- The ability to aggregate small things and recognize an overwhelming trend
- A good ability to backtrack through the &quot;Cause Chain&quot;
- Not being distracted by the high amplitude input... like loud makeup, dramatic stories... lies and venier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; testing a manager’s abilities in these areas without letting them know they’re being tested</p>
<p>Not sure that I have a direct way.  But the thing I have been taught about creating such tests is from watching women ask questions.  Ask a question to which the correct answer is to not answer it at all.  For example a yes or no question that the correct answer is to discount the question in the first place.</p>
<p>But some clues at recognizing the ability to judge well:<br />
- The ability to disconnect from the surface and see through to the underlying waves.<br />
- The ability to aggregate small things and recognize an overwhelming trend<br />
- A good ability to backtrack through the &#8220;Cause Chain&#8221;<br />
- Not being distracted by the high amplitude input&#8230; like loud makeup, dramatic stories&#8230; lies and venier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

