<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Rigor (Part 3 of 3)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techdarkside.com/in-defense-of-rigor-part-3-of-3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techdarkside.com/in-defense-of-rigor-part-3-of-3</link>
	<description>Struggles of a Self-Taught Coder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A_Raybould</title>
		<link>http://www.techdarkside.com/in-defense-of-rigor-part-3-of-3/comment-page-1#comment-16239</link>
		<dc:creator>A_Raybould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techdarkside.com/?p=122#comment-16239</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a couple of years late in replying, but there&#039;s been no discernible progress over that time! There has, however, been an event that should make it plain, to those who are interested in looking, that this matters: the financial crisis. Between the abuse of value-at-risk models, often by people who didn&#039;t understand them, and the corruption of information resulting from the ratings agencies selling out, there&#039;s plenty of evidence that lack of rigor hurts. 
 
Your article puts me in mind of Richard Feynman&#039;s fairly well-known talk on the nature of scientific inquiry, in which he compared pseudo-sciences to Polynesian cargo cults.  In my opinion, economics has been perilously close to the latter, though I do believe it is getting better. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m a couple of years late in replying, but there&#039;s been no discernible progress over that time! There has, however, been an event that should make it plain, to those who are interested in looking, that this matters: the financial crisis. Between the abuse of value-at-risk models, often by people who didn&#039;t understand them, and the corruption of information resulting from the ratings agencies selling out, there&#039;s plenty of evidence that lack of rigor hurts. </p>
<p>Your article puts me in mind of Richard Feynman&#039;s fairly well-known talk on the nature of scientific inquiry, in which he compared pseudo-sciences to Polynesian cargo cults.  In my opinion, economics has been perilously close to the latter, though I do believe it is getting better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

